Vs > Lower Hutt, Gracefield
| Sibenik vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Climate & Distance Between | |
Sibenik vs Moyobamba, Peru
Sibenik vs San Juan, Dominican Republic
Sibenik vs Port-Gentil, Gabon
Sibenik vs Duverge, Dominican Republic
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Tarboro, Nc, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Turiacu, Brazil
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Ushibuka, Japan
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Newnan, Ga, Usa
Yuma, Arizona vs Nikopol’
Auckland Airport vs Gunnarn
Murcia/ San Javier vs san andres, San Andres And Providencia Islands
Tela vs Attu Island, Alaska
- The distance between Sibenik, Croatia and Lower Hutt, Gracefield, New Zealand is approximately 18,276 km or 11,357 mi.
- To reach Sibenik in this distance one would set out from Lower Hutt, Gracefield bearing 286.3° or WNW and follow the great circles arc to approach Sibenik bearing 268° or W .
- Sibenik has a Mediterranean hot climate (Csa) whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield has a marine west coast climate (Cfb).
- Sibenik is in or near the warm temperate dry forest biome whereas Lower Hutt, Gracefield is in or near the warm temperate thorn steppe biome.
- The annual mean temperature is 2 °C (3.6°F) warmer.
- Average monthly temperatures vary by 9.9 °C (17.8°F) more in Sibenik. The continentality subtype is semicontinental as opposed to barely hyperoceanic.
- Total annual precipitation averages 438.6 mm (17.3 in) less which is equivalent to 438.6 l/m² (10.76 US gal/ft²) or 4,386,000 l/ha (468,893 US gal/ac) less. About 2/3 as much.
- The altitude of the sun at midday is overall 1.8° lower in Sibenik than in Lower Hutt, Gracefield.
Climate Comparison Table
The table shows values for Sibenik relative to Lower Hutt, Gracefield. You can also view this comparison the other way around from the perspective of Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Sibenik.
| |
Jan |
Feb |
Mar |
Apr |
May |
Jun |
Jul |
Aug |
Sep |
Oct |
Nov |
Dec |
|
Annual |
| Average Temperature °C ( °F) |
-11 (-20) |
-11 (-19) |
-7 (-12) |
0 (-1) |
+7 (+12) |
+12 (+22) |
+16 (+28) |
+15 (+27) |
+10 (+18) |
+4 (+6) |
-3 (-5) |
-7 (-13) |
|
+2 (+4) |
| Average Precipitation mm (in) |
-4 (0) |
+6 (+0) |
-32 (-1) |
-51 (-2) |
-81 (-3) |
-91 (-4) |
-112 (-4) |
-105 (-4) |
-29 (-1) |
+1 (+0) |
+40 (+2) |
+19 (+1) |
|
-439 (-17) |
| Average Daylight Hours & Minutes/ Day |
-5h 27' |
-3h 22' |
-0h 37' |
+2h 19' |
+4h 50' |
+6h 07' |
+5h 32' |
+3h 22' |
+0h 31' |
-2h 24' |
-4h 53' |
-6h 07' |
|
0h 00' |
| Sun altitude at solar noon on the 21st day (°) |
-42.2 |
-23.6 |
-2 |
+21.2 |
+37.8 |
+44.3 |
+38.4 |
+21.7 |
-1.1 |
-23.8 |
-42.1 |
-49.3 |
| -1.8 |
There are so many comparison pages. Please post a link to one to help people find them:
Sibenik vs Klamath Falls, Or, Usa
Sibenik vs Potsdam, Germany
Sibenik vs Constantine (Ain El Bey), Algeria
Sibenik vs Pine River Dam, Mn, Usa
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs La Serena-La Florida, Chile
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Jos, Nigeria
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Zigansk, Russia
Lower Hutt, Gracefield vs Cairns, Australia
Tystofte vs Hartington, Ne
Hail vs Wakkanai
Decimomannu vs Midland, Tx
Puerto Montt vs Parma, Emilia Romagna
Sibenik vs Lower Hutt, Gracefield Discussion
You are welcome to incorporate your thoughts on the differences in climate or other matters such as contrasts in culture, standard of living, demographics etc.
|